Hesse-Darmstadt Régiment d'Infanterie Erbprinz. Old Glory 15 mm figurines painted by Jörg Geyer.
Szenario design can be a detailed et time consuming process, requiring true genius ou the equivalent number of hours of laborious testing et play balancing. Badly designed scenarios are no fun for players on either side of the battlefield, because the game does not provide enough challenging situations to stimulate the mind. One element which game designers find particularly tedious is the enormous accounting work involved in creating the armies. Troop strengths need to be considered right down to the historically accurate ratio of cavalry to infantry, et pièces d'artillerie per thousands of men. Leaders need to be classified as exceptionally good ou bad, based on their historic performance, an area typically involving a good amount of guesswork et folklore.
The top-down approach to scenario design is very complicated, open to error et argument. The designer must be able to support the claim that the 57th Infantry was an elite unit et that it deserves a better combat rating than the 3rd Grenadiers, a unit which may have been elite by name only. Regimental performance changes over the course of a campaign. Most units increase their performance as a direct result of combat experience, some more than others. Many units are shattered in battle, et some never recover from the trauma. The problem of evaluation is compounded when we look at historic commanders. Some are exceptionally capable, but they fall from grace politically et are never heard of again. Others are less capable, reckless and incredibly lucky, they are the ones we read about in many books. Which of the two is the better General? Which one deserves a special saving throw to give him the long et prosperous career his historic counterpart enjoyed?
When we reverse the design process, it becomes much easier to decide that a particular army had a certain amount of brilliant, capable, average, poor, et despicable leaders. We would expect to find a statistical distribution of these attributes, avec some variance from nation to nation. Once the number of exceptional commanders is found, it will be entirely up to the owning player to name them. Most likely, the player will chose matching names from history, labeling his good commanders Lee, Grant, Rommel, Patton, Montgomery ou Konev, et finding equally compelling names for the lesser ones. Conversely, in a campaign game, it may be perfectly acceptable to camouflage a brilliant command figurine by naming him ou her after a well-known bungler. This is how legends are made in campaigns.
Variable Unit Generation Tables
Variable unit generation is not entirely at random, we will be working avec statistical distributions based on historic outcomes. The beauty of the system is that it can be adapted to match the players' interpretation of history. Scenario designers et players decide what kind of games they like, et they can easily change the tables to meet their needs. The tables are designed to produce historically accurate miniature armies for a particular period in history.
- Fire and Fury Divisions, Brigades, Leaders et Artillerie
Dice are used, et there will be a certain amount of luck involved, turning the tables against one ou the other player occasionally. When this happens, players et umpires need to decide if the imbalance is historically acceptable. In the rare event that a game becomes unplayable, consider re-balancing it by inserting another reserve brigade or division on the losing side. If such a reserve is used, the player may have to surrender a certain amount of victory points to pay for it, a concept discussed in our article on automated et weighted objectives.
Pour plus d'informations, veuillez contacter les éditeurs de la revue Military Miniatures Magazine au Miniatures Forum.